Ticket to Ride: One of my personal favorites. Julie shot it down; we played it together once and Julie decided the 2-player version was not fun.
Sequence: This time we both agreed that the 2-player version left a lot to be desired.
UNO, Rook, or other card games: No. Not in the mood.
Yahtzee: Maybe, but it’s probably too noisy and we would soon have a five player game, in stead of two player, so not tonight.

Rummikub: It’s a dumb name. That and the fact that every time Julie & I play this game, it ends in an argument. It’s always the same argument too, but I can’t remember the exact details. It has something to do with substituting a tile in your hand for a wild or something like that. Then Julie accuses me of taking liberties with the rules, I open the rule book and demonstrate exactly why my move is complex, but perfectly legal. She compares it to all of the complex, but “legal” moves at Enron, AIG, Lehman, Bear Stearns, and every other failed, corrupt institution. I compare her views to obtuse regulators that like to kill patients in order to stop the spread of a non-communicable disease. She says I’m in Banking and know nothing about disease. I try to explain that I was speaking metaphorically and that it means that there isn’t a financial problem that regulators can’t make worse. She says I’m in Banking and know nothing about metaphors. I explain that regulators are a necessary evil, but more evil than necessary. She says that’s irrelevant.
It never ends well.
We haven’t played the game in six years. We nearly had an argument about what the Rummikub argument was about. If Julie reads this post, she will undoubtedly say that our arguments never went anything like that and point out that if we haven’t had this argument in six years, than the entire diatribe about regulators, Lehman, Enron & metaphors could never have happened. We agreed to never mention Rummikub again.
Chocolate-opoly: I don’t like this one, so I didn’t even mention it.
Every Other Game in our Closet: Need more people, not in the mood, etc.

Boggle: I always bring this one up last, because it’s the game we always play. I get the big words, Julie gets the little words. The tattered, formerly-paper-backed Merriam-Webster settles all disputes. I have at least one long, quasi-word in each round. Julie always finds a few extra onomatopoeic words of dubious quality. I suppose “dit” is a word, referring to the non-dash part of Morse code, but it’s a lesser word. If we can demote Pluto to “dwarf planet” status, surely words like “dit” can be demoted to midget-words. They would no longer count in games like Boggle and Scrabble, and would be ineligible for crosswords. They could be in dictionaries with proper footnotes, like they have for “ain’t,” that let all users know that these words are really midget-words and are only included for completeness.
By this time Julie was into her second game of Cash Cow 2 on the Webkinz site and just responded with a u-huh to every thing I said. I laid down on the bed, waiting for her to finish so we could play, *sigh*, Boggle.
An hour later, I woke up when Julie asked me if I can remember the password to one of the on-line bill pay sites. I mumbled incoherently about midget-words and metaphors. Then I drifted off again, thinking of all the games we didn’t play.
I have to say that this is 75% fabrication. Liar, liar pants on fire, and all those other silly things we used to say as kids apply. Banking is only something that Dan and I talk about when I can't get to sleep at night, and he really does cheat at Rummikub, not that I'm bitter or anything. As for the Boggle debauchery, anyone who has played with us before knows that I asterisks my "lesser" words, (if I made them up I fess up, unlike Dan's made up "quasi words") and as for midget words, all you other English grads out there know that "the" is the most used word in the English language, where would we be without it?!
ReplyDeleteOne more thing, I was not playing "Cash Cow 2," that happens to be Dan's little favorite, I was actually typing up zucchini recipes for a friend. Anyone looking for new and exciting ways to have zucchini, let me know, the recipes are all typed up now!
ReplyDeleteI'll take some zucchini recipes. And midget words are the cash cow of Boggle, sorry, Dan.
ReplyDeleteDan I think you play games like Dad plays games. Dad also likes to manipulate game moves to make them seem legitimate so he can win. I expect it from a lawyer and now I know to expect it from a banker. Of course it might be an inherited genetic quirk that you are helpless to resist.
ReplyDeleteMy midget-word designation is not a reference to word length, but word quality. I always write down "the" in Boggle when I find it. Words like "dit" (which Julie says she never used before, but will now) and "hah" are words, but they are so marginal as to be midget-words.
ReplyDeleteI would also like to point out that our dispute over games is limited to Rummikub and is limited to one rule. I do not change the rules or create new ones. I don't offer Monopoly deals to my children to save myself from bankruptcy, thereby granting the deal making child a serious advantage over the other. (Not that I am bitter, but Becky should never have won that game...never mind that it happened over 20 years ago.)
Risk is a good choice for a quiet evening. By the time the game heats up to dispute levels, it's time to call it a night.
ReplyDeleteUntil this post, the only game that didn't involve Dad that generated disputations was Rummikub. Now, apparently, Boggle does too. Me and my midget-words.
ReplyDeleteDan, thanks for the lead on "hah" I'll look for that one now too!
ReplyDelete